HIPS are not required if you sell you home as having ROOMS upstairs, simple really.
However the HIP pack providers come out with such nonsense, to try and ram a pack down your throat.
Take a look at this ABSOLUTE RUBBISH, from the association of home information pack providers [AHIPP] or the village idiots for short.
- Owners of four bedroom properties will re-brand their homes as ‘three bedroom and a study’ – contrary to Tory propaganda the likelihood of a consumer opting to re-brand their four bedroom home as a three bed is unrealistic and impractical and it would take an irresponsible agent to suggest this.
- FACT: Their is no legal definition of a bedroom, Market as 4 rooms plus upstairs you are HIPS free. see Bedroom definition.
- A four bedroom home commands a much higher price than a three bedroom property and sellers are not going to be willing to knock thousands of pounds off the price of their home, simply to save themselves the estimated £300 to £400 [more like £700] that it will cost them to acquire a HIP – a pack that will actually aid the sale of their home.
- More nonsense, a HIPs pack is a £700 liability, and not an aid to selling your home. Home buyers will still need the actual local searches, so they save nothing and the house price goes up £700 to pay for the HIP.
3 BEDROOM PLUS STUDY IS NOT A 3 BEDROOM HOME
- In addition, a large number of house hunters commence their search for a new home online. With the majority of property searches asking for a prospective buyer to refine their search by number of bedrooms – those re-branding their homes as three bedroom will be severely limiting their exposure to potential buyers.
Nonsense. Buyers look for LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION and don’t rely on the Internet.
- ‘Fudging the date’ when the house went on the market – HIPs will help to improve the house buying and selling process and will provide buyers with upfront information on the property from the offset.
Nonsense again HIPS provide nothing to buyers the pack is just a waste a paper, most of the searches in the pack are not accepted by building society’s and banks and as always its BUYER BEWARE.
- Sellers will risk paying the £200 fine rather than paying for a HIP – this is a fact that has continually been mis-reported. The £200 fine for not acquiring a HIP is a repeatable fine and not a one off penalty.
- Nonsense again the seller does not have to comply with Trading standards if “they have a reasonable excuse for not doing so”. See trading standards on HIPS
Here is an organization spouting absolute nonsense, and they want the public to trust them….
Mike Ockenden, Director General, AHIPP concludes: “HIP are finally here and should be welcomed by consumers, environmentalists and industry alike.
Filed under: home information pack providers, Home information packs, home-information -pack, homeowner information packs, sellers pack | 1 Comment »